JVibe
Chabad of the West Bank Print
Written by Jeremy Gillick   
Tuesday, 23 September 2008

Chabad Rabbis Play a Key Role in Israel's Right Wing Settler Movement

Image
Early Lubavitch settlers in Hebron. Images courtesy the Nachshons.
After a frenzied prayer session in the battered structure beside the grave of the daughter of the second Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Danny Cohen pulls up a chair next to me and sits down. Youngish, heavily bearded, and jovial, he could easily be one of the Chabad emissaries drifting about your college campus, tefillin in hand, asking, "Excuse me, are you Jewish?" But Cohen operates in a setting more hostile than the average American bastion of secularism: since 2002, he has been running a Chabad house in the Jewish West Bank settlement in Hebron.

A city that has grown notorious for incidents of violence between settlers, soldiers, and Palestinians, Hebron is home to one of the most controversial Jewish settlements in the West Bank. The Israeli human rights group B'Tselem has reported that the once-bustling Palestinian commercial center there has been reduced to a "ghost town" by the security apparatus that protects the Jews there. Settlers in the city believe that the entire Biblical Land of Israel belongs exclusively to the Jews, and reject any sort of agreement that would limit Jewish sovereignty.

Despite the setting, Danny Cohen's work is much like that of any other Chabad emissary. He hosts Shabbats for Israeli soldiers, gives tours of the city's ancient Jewish sites to visitors, and organizes children's activities. He was appointed to his post by the Israeli body designated by the Lubavitcher Rebbe to appoint shluchim, just as he had been appointed by the parallel American body for his last job as a shaliach in Chicago. He was even the subject of a feature story in the most recent issue of Chabad's international newsletter.

Cohen is a mainstream Chabad rabbi, yet he exists on the fringes of Israel's political map. In that, he is not alone. For all the discord within the movement since the death of the Rebbe in 1994, what binds the Lubavitchers together is nothing less than their messianic determination, in the face of daunting political realities, to keep the Holy Land from once again falling apart.

"You Should Live Inside of Hevron"

Image
Baruch Nachshon in his studio in Hebron.
When the Cohen family moved to Israel in the late 1970s, Danny was six. As an Orthodox adolescent growing up in the nearby settlement of Psagot, "on the outskirts of the friendly city of Ramallah," Cohen felt drawn to Hebron, the site of the Tomb of the Patriarchs and the second holiest city in Judaism.

No Jews lived in Hebron at the time, but many lived in Kiryat Arba, a settlement bordering Hebron that was built by a group of Jewish radicals eager to reclaim the city itself. Among those radicals were Baruch and Sarah Nachshon, a young Lubavitch couple whom Cohen would later meet, and whose actions would inspire Cohen to join Chabad.

"You should live inside of Hevron, not in Kiryat Arba, because Hevron belongs to the Jews," Sarah claimed the Lubavitcher Rebbe had told her, according to a 1996 article in N'Shei Habad, a newsletter for Lubavitch women. "So, I decided to be the bone in the neck of the government."

Rebellion came naturally to Sarah Nachshon, whose fact-on-the-ground style had previously been employed to force the government to re-open Hebron's Jewish cemetery for burials, and to allow Jews into the Tomb of the Patriarchs, where they had not set foot since the 13th century. When the Begin government agreed to evacuate the settlement of Yamit in the Sinai Desert as part of the 1979 peace agreement with Egypt, Baruch Nachshon declared at a community meeting that unless a Jewish presence was established in Hebron proper, the government was liable to dismember Kiryat Arba next, and Sarah saw an opening for her greatest stand yet.

On April 26th, 1979, just after Passover, the holiday of liberation, Sarah woke her children in the middle of the night and hurried them into a truck already packed with people outside their Kiryat Arba home. At 4:30 in the morning, a group of about 15 women and 35 children arrived at Beit Hadassah, a vacant hospital in downtown Hebron once owned by Jews. One by one, they climbed a ladder and, after cutting through some barbed wire, slipped through a small window in the back of the building.

For eight months, the women occupied Beit Hadassah. Eventually, the murder of six yeshiva students near Hebron gave Prime Minister Begin a pretext to allow the restoration of the old Jewish quarter. Today, just under 1,000 Jews reside in a heavily guarded enclave in Hebron, protected from the city's 160,000 Palestinians by a huge military presence. Israeli soldiers patrol the street corners, and violent incidents such as the 1994 murder of 29 Palestinian civilians at the Tomb of the Patriarchs by Baruch Goldstein have made the settlement famous as a hotbed of bloody conflict.

"He is Too Powerful"

Image
The Nachshon family.
Chabad's association with the right wing of the settler movement goes beyond a few shluchim on the ground in the West Bank. The leaders of the messianic wing of Chabad in Israel, those who preach that the deceased rebbe of the Lubavitch movement, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, was the messiah, affiliate with right wing parties and reject a secular democratic government in favor of a theocratic Torah state. They are Rabbi Sholom Dov Wolpo of Kiryat Gat and Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg of Kfar Chabad.

Wolpo, who briefly entered the media spotlight in America in late 2007 after suggesting that Prime Minister Olmert be hanged, heads an organization called SOS-Israel that fights government opposition to illegal settlements. Ginsburg presides over the Od Yosef Chai Yeshiva in the militant settlement of Yitzhar, near Nablus, and has written a book in praise of Baruch Goldstein. While Chabad's American leadership based in Crown Heights has publicly distanced itself from Wolpo and Ginsburg, both remain influential and widely accepted in Israel.

According to Shmarya Rosenberg, an ex-Lubavitcher who blogs at failedmessiah.typepad.com , Wolpo is the most popular Chabad rabbi in Israel. "Chabad cannot and will not excommunicate him," he insists. "He is too powerful."

Wolpo, who says that Danny Cohen is his "best friend," believes that the Rebbe approves of his work and does not see himself as particularly controversial. He claims a healthy relationship with Israel's Chabad leadership and is dismissive of Crown Heights headquarters. "Everybody knows that the Rebbe was fighting not to give territory to the Arabs," he explains, "and I was chosen by the Rebbe to write two books about his ideas to keep the Land of Israel."

Indeed, the Rebbe not only opposed territorial concessions; he also favored settlement of all of biblical Israel. According to When Silence is a Sin, written by Mordechai Sones and Yankel Koncepolski and published by Sichos in English, the Rebbe gave an address on Sunday, September 25, 1977, declaring: "[T]he entire Land of Israel should be populated, along its entire boundaries. This is similar to that which is said regarding Torah and mitzvos; just as we must perform the actual physical act, so must it be regarding the integrity of the Land of Israel; the physical act is necessary: to settle the entire Land of Israel!'"

Ginsburg, the subject of a forthcoming study by Motti Inbari titled Jewish Fundamentalism and the Temple Mount, is even more radical than Wolpo. Ginsburg studied under the Rebbe in America and now lives in Kfar Chabad, Israel's version of Crown Heights. He preaches Jewish supremacy, opposition to the secular Israeli government, and the importance of building the third temple. According to Inbari, "almost no notable [religious] authority has challenged Ginsburg's views."

Ginsburg's yeshiva, Inbari argues, "has had a profound influence on the entire settlement movement." In particular, Ginsburg is behind a new trend of Jewish terrorism in Israel where "acts of violence [are] committed by individual terrorists in an independent and spontaneous manner." Indeed, a recent article in the Israeli daily Ha'aretz reported that students from Ginsburg's Yeshiva, many of whom do not identify as Lubavitchers, are taking an active role" in the escalation of violent attacks against Palestinians.

Danny Cohen defends Ginsburg and Wolpo, with some reservations. "Sometimes he poorly chooses his words, but I think that the bottom line is that he's one of the few people, not only in Chabad but also in Israel, who puts up a voice against repeating such tragedies as the disengagement [from Gaza]," Cohen says of Wolpo.

As for Ginsburg, "I wouldn't call him mainstream," Cohen explains. "Ginsburg is a kabbalist. To people on the outside, things he says about land and other nations dwelling in the land seem extreme, but it's all according to inner Kabbalah. He sometimes speaks a language that media or people not used to his teachings don't understand."

While Inbari concedes that this is largely true, especially insofar as many of his direct disciples are not Lubavitchers, he believes that the ideology espoused by the extreme Lubavitch messianists may "become more and more dominant within Chabad." The virtual independence of Chabad rabbis in Israel from headquarters in Crown Heights means that no central authority can rein in heretics. And the appeal of the messianists, already stronger in Israel than in the United States, seems only to intensify with time.

The Specter of Failure

Among the Lubavitch, an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank would require either ideological dissonance or an admission of failure on an apocalyptic scale. The Rebbe taught that this would be the generation of redemption. Withdrawal would mean accepting that he was wrong, or that the followers of the Rebbe did not sufficiently prepare the world for the messiah's arrival.

For Danny Cohen, thirty-six years old and at work full time in the Rebbe's service, the possibility that his efforts might eventually end in failure is too painful to imagine. Even for him, a moderate by Chabad standards, the greatest threat to the messianic vision lies in the land-for-peace negotiations. "The final redeemer is around the corner," he says. "Hopefully he will be the next Prime Minister. But, at the end of the day, people will vote for the person who will be most consistently pro-integrity of the land."

Cohen doesn't identify as a member of the messianist camp, but his sympathy for them is growing. "We all know that Chabad, from the beginning, 200 years ago, is focused on bringing the Moshiach [messiah]," Cohen says. He has now managed to include the number 770, the address of the Rebbe's office on Eastern Parkway in Brooklyn, in his email address, telephone number and home address. "We're fanatics," he jokes.

Comments
Add NewSearch
David Eliezrie (72.245.84.xxx) 2008-10-03 10:37:19

It would be very difficult to write a more disingenuous article about
Chabad positions in Israel.

True Chabad, as many others believe that territorial concessions are risky and can endanger the security of the State. A position endorsed by much of the military and defense establishment. Based on this premise, which is rooted in Halacha Chabad has consistently expressed a view that first and foremost we must consider the impact of possible concessions on the security of Israeli citizens. Chabad's position has nothing to do with redemption. It is purely based on security considerations.

Rabbi Sholom B. Wolpo has been condemned time and again by Chabad's Israeli establishment, not just the American headquarters. He is not considered a Chabad Schliach, and has been banned from Chabad official events. When he made his recent controversial statements Chabad web sites in Israel castigated him and the leadership publicly condemned him yet again.
In fact the Rebbe himself told Wolpo in regards to the Moshiach issue, that if he continues to promotes his viewpoint he is and I quote " making a war against me". In the same statement the Rebbe told him to cease and desist to teach his views.
He has no standing in Chabad in Israel, nor does he run any institutions. The assertion that he is popular is ludicrous.

Ginsburg also has no position in the movement and never has. His institutions been considered part of Chabad and his views have repudiated by Chabad leadership in Israel. Nor did he spend time studying by the Rebbe in New York. In fact, most of his period in Yeshiva was in non Chabad institutions in Israel.

Finally the author fails to note that Chabad has a long history in Hevron going back to the 1820s. The oldest Chabad synagogue in the world in in Hevron. Much of the ancient Jewish quarter is owned by Chabad including the Romanov property, purchased about a century ago.

Finally the work of Rabbi Danny Cohen is legendary. He is not involved in politics but in helping soldiers and the Jewish residents in Hevron. Time and again he has been the voice of reason and moderation, bringing harmony into the community. Serving bridge between the military and the residents.
Seriously?
Yaakov (77.125.78.xxx) 2008-10-06 15:25:43

I'm generally pretty leftist on issues of Israeli politics, but to talk about Chabad in Hevron and to NOT mention the fact that they have owned property there, had yeshivot there, and supported communities there since LONG before Herzl's incarnation of Zionism, and LONG before the more modern incarnation of "Religious Zionism" is atrocious. As a loyal reader of New Voices, I hate to say it, but this is truly terrible journalism.
bias
danielle (132.74.99.xxx) 2008-10-09 13:35:27

what a disgustingly skewed, anti-Chabad, left wing, anti-settler movement article. please do some real research next time and at least pretend to attempt some sort of journalistic integrity.
hevron settler (62.219.49.xxx) 2008-10-10 01:46:19

i think in general Jeremy wrote in a fair way
one thing that bothers me is the ignorance of the 1929 massacre
the writer tries to paint a "two sided confrontation" and neglects to mention that the areas in dispute were once populated by inocent and unarmed jews that were killed,burnt,raped and tourtured on the weekend of august 18 1929/
in fact the same "once-bustling Palestinian commercial center there has been reduced to a "ghost town"
that jeremy writes about is situated on Jewish property that was stolen after the masacare
and one more thing
i know Danny Cohen and his work is great
he respects and loves everyone and does give some credit to Rabbi Wolpo for speaking up even if it is to harshly
but "best friend"?! hardly...
in general jeremy gave rabbi Wolpo credit and leadership that is WAYU beyond his political and leadership position in Chabad in Israel today.
Jew
Deena (93.172.75.xxx) 2008-10-10 03:09:18

R' Danny and Bat Sheva Cohen are doing a fantastic job caring for the wellbeing of the soldiers in and around Hebron. Ask any soldier!
Although Chabad owns much property in Hebron, property stolen by the Arabs as they massacred innocent people, he pays a hefty sum to rent an old flat in the Avraham Avinu neighborhood, which serves as the Chabad House- open to all. On a Friday night, one can find at least 50 soldiers (sometimes in shifts) eating a homemade meal (complete with freshly baked challahs). The family also visits the soldiers at their bases, bringing them goodies and spiritual fare.
They also run a kollel at the site of Menucha Rochel's grave and have renovated the Middle Rebbe's shul.
The only thing fanatic in the Cohen family's outlook is their love of fellow Jews and their dedication to bringing the sources of Judaism to the nation. This includes, of course, the belief in settling the Land of Israel.
sorry Eliezrie but your logic
Avi (141.149.57.xxx) 2008-10-10 04:30:53

just cuz the establishment, corporate Chabad does not accept Rabbi Wolpo - that is no proof that Rabbi Wolpo is not popular. it just means the establishment does not accept him.
video of Wolpo
Yitz (141.149.57.xxx) 2008-10-10 06:26:34

if anyone is insterested to learn about Rabbi Wolpo first hand, follow the link below. he has a heavy accent but he is speaking in English in a video that was filmed earlier this year. it can be seen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Qx3QWI38Pg
Completely lost
Elchonon Hellinger (79.179.146.xxx) 2008-10-12 08:03:54

This entire article seems to connect dany cohen and chabad of chevron with extremists.

I have lived here for a year and a half and have been coming for shabbat for well over 5 years.

Chabad of chevron has been around for 200 years and has nothing to do with extremists.

Chevron has been and always will be a jewish city, testament of this, is the jewish rebels in the 2nd temple retaking hebron as is recorded in Josephus.

One cannot but wonder why its always the jew's fault.

One cannot dictate history and holyness based on politix. This is the birthplace of judaism, resting place of our forefathers and mothers.. its known as "the entrance to the garden of eden" the 2nd holliest site in judaism.

I see nothing messianic in my desire to live here..

The Lubavitcher rebbe did however say that chevron has the numerical value of pinchas eliyahu and moshiach will go forth from chevron.

Please get your facts and opinions straight, dany is here doing the rebbe's work. I am here living as a jew.. pin the violence to where it comes from.. the arabs.
One must wonder
MNC (24.184.34.xxx) 2008-10-27 19:55:12

One must wonder how a student of history can possibly differentiate between what the "settlers of today" are doing in Hevron, Beit El, Ofra, and Shiloh and what the "settlers of the First and Second Aliyah" did in Yafo, Haifa, Ashdod, and Be'er-Sheva.

Under any theory of property rights and/or national sovereignty, the Jew's rights to the four "modern" settlements cannot be distinguished in any way from the "old" settlements of pre-Independence Israel.

If there is something "wrong" with the Israeli settlements in Yesha, why exactly were the settlements in Ottoman and Mandate Palestine any more legitimate.

Without being illogical and inconsistent in one's morality and ethics, one cannot support Israeli rights in cities such as Ashdod, Be'er-Sheva, Haifa, Netanya, Eilat, Yafo, Tzfat, or Tiberias UNLESS one also accepts the legitimacy of Israeli rights in Beit El, Shiloh, Ariel, Maaleh Adumim, and Gush Katif.

The answer "the UN Partitioned the land as two states," is meaningless, because the UN Partition also assigned Yafo, Beer-Sheva, Eilat, Ashdod, and Acre to be a part of the new Arab state.

The answer "the Green Line dictates the 'just boundaries' is no answer at all, since the Green Line was never contemplated as a just and final border, but was merely an armistice line where the Jewish and Arab armies happened to be located when the war ended. There was no consideration of "justness" in these artificial lines...They were merely where the war stopped. If one considers where a war "stops" to be THE "just boundaries" than you must recognize the absurd claim that Israel's boundaries should extend from Suez (where the Kadesh campaign stopped) all the way up to the Litani River (where Operation Litani stopped)....and clearly this claim is absurd.

So please, understand that Hevron is no different than Ashdod...Beit El no different than Be'er Sheva.

Am Yisrael Chai
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
Security Image
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.