The Conspiracy

More on Israeli Apartheid Week

To start, let me apologize for the delay. I was in the midst of a move and was unable to access the Internet until now. Fortunately, this gave me the opportunity to further grapple with Israeli Apartheid Week–and my editor Ben’s response–and hopefully formulate a coherent defense of my position.

First off, let me acknowledge where I agree with Ben. Namely, Israeli Apartheid can not and will not ever exist. The term, as Ben correctly pointed out, exists solely within the South African political paradigm; it’s an Afrikaans word that pertains exclusively to that country’s discriminatory series of legislation against members of its own population. But semantics aside, there are undeniable similarities between South Africa’s treatment of blacks and coloureds under Apartheid and Israel’s treatment of Gazans and West Bank residents up to and including today.

So while we can all agree that Israeli Apartheid Week is a misnomer on a number of levels – that is, it’s not Apartheid and it’s not a week – its continued presence, now six years strong, begs examination.

The aim of my earlier post was to do just that. At no point did I, as my editor claimed, join in the chorus of the BDS movement. Rather, I sought to encourage a constructive dialogue within Israel and abroad on the issues and arguments espoused during IAW. My goal was to argue against the knee-jerk reaction of too many Jews and Israelis, which impels them to immediately dismiss any criticism of the state of Israel as anti-Zionist and/or anti-Semitic, thereby dismissing any disparagement of Israeli policy as wholly irrational.

While Ben correctly asserts that IAW was spearheaded by anti-Zionists, this does not make the campaign’s arguments any less pertinent. I’ve spoken with many Zionists who do support calls for boycotts, divestment, and sanctions, if only to protect Israel from further Islamic extremism. Further, I’d argue that the American lobby J Street’s Invest in Peace campaign speaks to the growing sentiment among many Jews who believe in the promise of a Jewish state but are against what they see to be discriminatory Israeli policy, South African nomenclature or not.

Ben also mentioned the capability of the BDS movement to “demonize [Israel] internationally.”  While this is no doubt true, Israel’s stubborn refusal to accept criticism might be just as damaging to the nation’s image, if not moreso.  Correctly or incorrectly, people perceive Israel’s confidence as arrogance, its strength as brutality, and its hard-headedness as, well, hard-headedness.  This, without a doubt, plays into the hands of the Ahmadinejads and the Chavezes, allowing for an increasingly negative view of the country in international circles, left and right alike.

My modest proposal is that Israel engage the critiques of IAW and the BDS movement head on.  In fact, to restore calm and perhaps one day attain peace, I believe it must.  Quite simply, these movements will not disappear.  The more Israel and its supporters attempt to brush them off, the more they will fester.  The time to be proactive is now; Israel, show the world you want peace, and I assure you the criticism will abate.

In closing, I’d like to leave you with one final thought.  I am a proud Jew.  However, my identity as a Jew does not go hand-in-hand with my identity as a Zionist.  Rather, it stems from the simple notion of tikkun olam, of repairing the world.  That is what I strive to do everyday, through my writing and in my daily life.  For me, respecting each life, Jew or Gentile, is all-important.  I know enough of Jewish history to realize we need a state of our own, but it pains me to see that miraculous vision tainted by constant violence.  My hope is that this conviction – for peace and coexistence – shines through in these posts.

And lastly, I’d like to thank Ben Sales for what has turned into a vigorous debate.  Like any great editor, you’ve forced me to reevaluate my thinking and distill its true meaning.  If you please, the last word is yours.

Sam Melamed is a Masa participant, participating in Career Israel, one of Masa Israel‘s 160 programs.

Tags: , , , , ,

3 Older Responses to “More on Israeli Apartheid Week”

  1. Barry Deutsch
    March 7, 2010 at 1:45 pm #

    May I suggest that you add links to Ben’s post and to your original post? That way if someone runs across your post in a year or two, they won’t have to search the archives to find context.

    In the comments to Ben’s post, Enav wrote:

    The ‘crime of Apartheid’ is codified in international law under the International Convention for the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime Apartheid (ICSPCA), which came into force in 1976. As such, it has universal jurisdiction. Furthermore, the ‘crime of apartheid’ is also found in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). The ICC was created 10 years following the fall of the racist white regime in South Africa; thus the claim that ‘apartheid’ only applies to South Africa is false.

    That seems like a fairly persuasive argument to me, and a quick google shows that she’s correct about the ICC’s statute. So it doesn’t seem possible that the term apartheid means something that “exists solely within the South African political paradigm; it’s an Afrikaans word that pertains exclusively to that country’s discriminatory series of legislation against members of its own population.” Since you obviously disagree, will you explain why Enav’s argument is mistaken?

    Among people who don’t want Israel or the Jews wiped out, the debate over BDS and over the word “Apartheid” is at core a debate over how intransigent the government of Israel is perceived to be. In the comments to Ben’s post, Invisible_Hand wrote that “IAW is an unproductive program, since it will never work to bring people to the table for a productive discussion/dialogue.” But many people don’t think that Israel’s government will ever come in good faith to that table unless the US forces it to; and that will not happen without a great deal of very harsh criticism of Israel’s policies within the US, so that the tide of US public opinion turns strongly against support of Israeli policies.

  2. Pax R.
    March 7, 2010 at 3:04 pm #

    “My hope is that this conviction – for peace and coexistence – shines through in these posts.” Bravo!

    The road to peace is paved with respectful behaviour, good listening skills and group work.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Heeb Comments on Israeli Apartheid Week, As Does New Voices, As Does Al Jazeera « Abrahamic Notebook - March 5, 2010

    [...] Heeb, New Voices Heeb blogged about Israeli Apartheid Week. So did New Voices, New Voices and New Voices. On the other side of the Abrahamic spectrum, Al Jazeera posted a feature length video on its [...]

Leave a Reply

More in The Conspiracy (1330 of 1601 articles)